AgentStatus × Federato
Independent, distributed assurance for production AI agents, alongside Federato's AI-native insurance platform.
AgentStatus is how teams prove behaviour in the wild. Independent, distributed production assurance for AI agents with continuous checks, gold-based expectations, and alerting, run from 800+ nodes across 30 countries. We sit alongside Federato's RiskOps, Control Tower, and the agentic AI workflows Federato runs across the policy lifecycle. We do not replace them.
What we understand about Federato
The AI-native platform that spans the full policy lifecycle.
Federato is the AI-native insurance platform built to prevent strategy drift. RiskOps brings precision to underwriting; Control Tower delivers real-time portfolio steering; Submission to Quote lets agentic AI deliver complete, on-strategy quotes for underwriter review within seconds; Product Studio, Producer Portal, Policyholder Portal, and Billing & Payments complete a single platform across the policy lifecycle.
Federato customers include Nationwide, QBE, Ascot, Mission, Ascendex, HDVI, Velocity Risk, and Wholesure. The platform is publicly cited for outcomes including a 3.7x lift in high-appetite bound policies, 89% reduction in time to quote, 90% reduction in systems used, and 30% lift in high-appetite premiums. Backed by a $100M Series D from Goldman Sachs, with the Nationwide CIO going on record: "Lots of people are talking about Agentic AI as the future, but Federato is doing it now."
What AgentStatus is
Continuous, controlled validate traffic against production agent surfaces.
AgentStatus runs continuous, controlled validate traffic against production and staging agent surfaces, with gold libraries, drift detection, and alerting for teams that need clear, repeatable evidence when things break or drift.
That includes multi-turn flows and multi-agent journeys when real underwriter paths span submission, triage, AI decisioning, and quote review. It maps cleanly to governance and risk conversations when carriers, regulators, or auditors ask what ran, from where, and what changed.
For a platform shaping bound business at carriers writing tens of millions in limit per account, the cost of an undetected behaviour shift is not a UX issue. It is portfolio strategy drift, the exact thing Federato exists to prevent.
Where we fit
Complement, not overlap.
Strategy adherence vs continuous evidence
The Maturity Model gap
Global execution footprint
Partner-friendly integration posture
The split
Two truths, one story.
Federato, inside-out
- • RiskOps & Control Tower
- • Agentic AI quote generation
- • Strategy-drift prevention
- • Maturity Model L1–L5
- • Random underwriter quality audits
AgentStatus, outside-in
- • Continuous validate traffic
- • Gold libraries & drift detection
- • Multi-turn / multi-agent journeys
- • Real-network execution evidence
- • 800+ nodes across 30 countries
Proof of scale
Plain definitions, no inflation.
In about two months, we have executed on the order of 18 million validate runs across the network. We also maintain on the order of 6,000 agent records in our system, meaning rows and configurations we track, including evaluation and pipeline agents, not "6,000 paying customers."
We have also caught node operators trying to game the network with datacenter VMs instead of real consumer egress. Detection of adversarial behaviour is built into the product. If helpful, we can share stricter production-only definitions under NDA.
What we are not claiming
An independent layer that coexists.
We are not a replacement for RiskOps, Control Tower, the random underwriter audit process, or any of Federato's agentic AI workflows. We are an independent layer that can coexist with them, and where useful, help carriers, MGAs, and MGA aggregators correlate outside-in validate outcomes with inside-out strategy adherence, so leaders moving toward Maturity Levels 4 and 5 have continuous evidence the deployed agent is still operating within the rules and guardrails the carrier has set.
What we'd like from this conversation
Asks.
Validate the fit
As Federato's customers move up the Maturity Model toward Supervised and True Agentic AI Underwriting, where do they want independent assurance, and where does Federato prefer everything native to RiskOps?
A practical next step
A sandbox surface we can validate with gold prompts representative of an underwriting workflow (submission triage, agentic quote generation, strategy-drift checks), so Federato's agentic AI and AgentStatus drift detection tell one story together.
Partner path
If there is a partner path, we'd like to understand supported integration patterns for carriers, MGAs, and aggregators operating across multiple lines and geographies, particularly through Federato's relationships with Nationwide, QBE, and Ascot.
Closing
Federato helps carriers and MGAs build and operate AI-native underwriting that prevents strategy drift. AgentStatus helps those same teams prove, continuously, that the deployed agent behaves
the way appetite, regulators, and capital providers require, globally, with evidence that holds up under scrutiny.
Metrics are stated with explicit definitions: validate runs are scheduled executions over ~two months; agent records are database rows, not revenue customers. Public Federato references above reflect Federato's public product pages, customer disclosures, the 5-level AI Maturity Model, and the $100M Series D announcement (Goldman Sachs) as of the date of this note.