Block the deploys that quietly regress your agent.
Every PR runs the same evaluation prompts against the new version, diffs against your baseline, and posts a verdict back to GitHub before merge.
User-side validation isn't theory.We've been running it.
Agents continuously monitored across the global network.
USER-SIDE VALIDATIONS
Countries covered
The failure modes your current stack misses
Unit tests pass. Quality drops anyway.
Prompt tweaks, retrieval changes, and library bumps all pass green and still ship regressions.
Eval suites run too slowly to gate merges.
A full eval takes 20 minutes. Engineers merge without it and find regressions in prod.
Approvals are tribal.
Whoever owns the agent eyeballs the diff. There is no shared bar for 'good enough to ship'.
Behavioral diff posted to the PR.
Each PR runs the same prompts against the new and the baseline build. The diff posts as a status check with per-prompt detail.
- Pass / warn / fail per prompt
- Side-by-side answer diff
- Approve-anyway with required reason
A single threshold engineering can defend.
Set a minimum Quality Score per agent. PRs that drop below the threshold block on the status check.
- Configurable per agent
- Visible in the PR check
- Override audit-logged
Validate the regions your agent serves, every PR.
Validations run from the regions you nominate. A PR that breaks in São Paulo but passes in New York fails the gate.
- Multi-region per PR
- Per-region pass rate
- Region quarantine for noise
From first validation to signed report in two weeks
Connect
Point Agent Status at the user-facing surface of your agent. No SDK, no instrumentation. Average setup is under five minutes.
Watch
Live verdicts stream in from every region you serve. Drift and latency alerts route to PagerDuty or Slack, with a signed report on every run.