Back to Use Cases
Create agents for both variants
Run both for a testing period (1 week minimum)
Compare metrics
Comparing Agent Providers
Use Agent Status to compare reliability and performance across different AI providers.
The Challenge
You're choosing between multiple AI providers or models. You need objective data on:
- Which is most reliable?
- Which is fastest?
- Which works best in specific regions?
The Solution
Set up Agent Status agents for each provider and compare metrics side-by-side.
Setup
Register Multiple Agents
# Provider A
curl -X POST "https://api.agentstatus.dev/api/v1/agents" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AGENTSTATUS_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"name": "Provider A - GPT-4",
"endpoint_url": "https://api.providera.com/v1/chat/completions",
"prompts": ["What is 2+2?", "Explain quantum computing briefly"],
"geos": ["us", "eu", "ap"]
}'
# Provider B
curl -X POST "https://api.agentstatus.dev/api/v1/agents" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AGENTSTATUS_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"name": "Provider B - Claude",
"endpoint_url": "https://api.providerb.com/v1/messages",
"prompts": ["What is 2+2?", "Explain quantum computing briefly"],
"geos": ["us", "eu", "ap"]
}'
Use the same prompts and regions for fair comparison.
Comparison Metrics
Uptime
Provider A: 99.8% (168 hours)
Provider B: 99.2% (168 hours)
Winner: Provider A (fewer outages)
Latency
Provider A:
P50: 1,200ms
P95: 2,400ms
P99: 3,800ms
Provider B:
P50: 850ms
P95: 1,600ms
P99: 2,200ms
Winner: Provider B (faster responses)
Regional Performance
Provider A:
US: 800ms P50
EU: 1,100ms P50
AP: 2,400ms P50
Provider B:
US: 900ms P50
EU: 950ms P50
AP: 1,200ms P50
Winner: Provider B (more consistent globally)
Eval Pass Rate
Provider A: 98% eval pass rate
Provider B: 95% eval pass rate
Winner: Provider A (more accurate)
Decision Matrix
| Criteria | Weight | Provider A | Provider B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uptime | 30% | 99.8% ✅ | 99.2% |
| Latency P50 | 25% | 1,200ms | 850ms ✅ |
| Global consistency | 20% | ⚠️ High variance | ✅ Low variance |
| Accuracy | 25% | 98% ✅ | 95% |
| Weighted Score | 85 | 88 |
A/B Testing with Agent Status
Setup
Cost vs Performance
| Provider | Monthly Cost | Uptime | Latency | Value Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | $500 | 99.8% | 1,200ms | 0.20 |
| B | $300 | 99.2% | 850ms | 0.33 |
| C | $800 | 99.9% | 600ms | 0.12 |
Value Score = Uptime × (1/Latency) / Cost
Failover Configuration
Use comparison data to configure failover — route to the fastest available provider, falling back to the most reliable one when the primary is down.